Just caught this headline as I was checking my Yahoo! mail this morning - and just loved the 'snapshot' of the article under the headline -
Going to the article to investigate further, it refers to the Rose Report's recommendations about an increased use and understanding of technology for Primary school pupils, and a separate recommendation about history and the ability to opt to not teach World War 2 and the Victorians.
And Jim Knight is quoted as saying-
"Sir Jim Rose's report has not been completed let alone published yet - but we are already getting stories about dropping this or removing that from the curriculum.So, Twitter isn't replacing History - phew! However, I am pleased that it is being considered as a useful tool to be used in the Primary classroom. I've used it successfully a number of times, in RE and in Spanish and have always found the children to be very inquisitive about it and excited at the immediacy of the results. So would be good to have it 'accepted' rather than me using it 'on the sly!'
"The bottom line is that we are working with experts to free up the curriculum in a way that teachers have asked us to do but British history has, and always will be, a core part of education in this country.
"Of course pupils in primary school will learn about major periods including the Romans, the Tudors and the Victorians and will be taught to understand a broad chronology of major events in this country and the wider world.